Director: William A. Wellman
Alex – 8.0 Elliot – 8.1 IMDB 7.8 Rotten Tomatoes 7.5
Alex’s Commentary:
When I learned our first film would be a SILENT film, I thought this could be a long 141 minutes. Much to my surprise, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie! Just reissued in blu-ray, the movie had a wonderful score and its sepia coloring gave the film a feeling of warmth. I also hadn’t imagined the visual history lesson a film, produced in 1927 portraying events surrounding a fairly recent WWI, could provide. Although the story had some familiar themes of love triangle and men going off to war, it is possible this may have been new film territory. I was amazed at the technical quality of the production especially the dogfight scenes. The acting was solid and I guess one should expect expressive faces and mannerisms from silent film stars. Even got to see a brief scene with a young Gary Cooper! The glimpse into life in Paris and America in the early 1900s was especially memorable. As this is the first movie we are rating I wasn’t sure where to start but 8.0 seemed like a good place for a film I thoroughly enjoyed but knew I needed room to place films that I’m sure will evoke greater emotion and/or amazement. Let the film history tour commence….
Elliot’s Commentary:
Wings was the first movie to ever win the award for Best Motion Picture at the Academy Awards. However, contrary to the modern incarnation of the award, the award was actually dubbed Most Outstanding Production. Wings was also the only silent film to ever win the best picture honor, and that makes sense because it fell on the cusp of the new technology of sound becoming a viable option for film productions. While there had been short films in the past synched up to record players, 1927 was the year when the first “talkie”, The Jazz Singer, premiered. Wings was given the daunting task of providing the last hurrah for silent films as Hollywood entered a new era. Now in order to notify a reader of any possible bias in my writing, let it be known that I do not like silent films at all. I understand their historical significance but in the modern era I find it quite archaic to watch actors move their lips and wait for the title screen to tell me what a given exchange was about. I sometimes even prefer to pretend I am in Mystery Science Theater 3000 and make up the possible words they could be saying, but that is just my personal preference. With those concessions made however, I enjoyed Wings more than I thought I possibly could.
It takes about the first 20 minutes of the movie for a modern movie viewer to get used to the format of the silent film, and as soon as you do the fact that this film has no sound suddenly dissolves into the background as you become enveloped in the bizarre love quadrilateral between Jack (Charles Rodgers), David (Richard Arlen), Sylvia, (Jobyna Ralston), and Mary (Clara Bow). The special effects for 1927 were honestly spectacular, and really put the awful movies Ed Wood-esque B Movies made in the 1950’s and 1960’s into perspective. The score also provided a decisively driving force in the film, even though we did hear the remastered 6.1 digital sound on our blu-ray copy, it still maintained the original score. The dog fights in the film were truly ahead of their time and the limits the filmmakers pushed their dated technology to really deserve praise and admiration. There were even parts of the film where plane crashes had been colored by individually tinting each individual frame, providing a particularly stunning visual contrast to the monotony of black and white visuals.
Overall, I really enjoyed Wings more than I ever expected to, and is definitely in my top 10 favorite American silent films I have ever seen. If I were a moviegoer in 1927, I too would have wondered why sound was even important with silent films being able to provide such a spectacle of a production. If one has any interest in film history at all, I would highly suggest checking out this film. Also, made two years before All Quiet On the Western Front, it set the standard for production of war films, especially those about WWI.
Sarah and I saw Wings, a silent movie, at Beloit with a live symphony orchestra doing the soundtrack… a great way to see a great old movie!
David
Hah, I was just remembering that!
But Elliot, I refuse to let you generalize silent film in that manner. Metropolis? The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari? Nosferatu? Too many classics belong to the genre.
Sarah, while I do agree that movies like The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari and Nosferatu along with many other fantastic examples of German expressionism do stand out in the early narrative of film, I am a strong proponent of dialogue as a driving force in film. I do sometimes have issues separating early American examples of silent film like DW Griffith’s Birth of a Nation from the larger category of silent film, and perhaps the aforementioned statement may have come across a bit harshly. Let me rephrase: While I can see merit in the artistic achievement in set design as well as the pioneering techniques in cinematography developed during the silent film era that would influence later films, I do however prefer narration through spoken dialogue. I also am a big fan of the more vaudevillian silent film stars like Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton, but I prefer to separate them into an entirely different taxonomy from the larger scope of my filmic understanding. I hope that sheds some light on my opinion, but I definitely can understand your point as well.
-Elliot
I like what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and reporting!
Keep up the awesome works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to blogroll.